Thursday, February 28, 2008

Some Good Mutual Funds

It all depends on your investment time frame and your financial position on where you should invest and how much. Anyway going by a thumb rule created by me., the "Must Have" funds in any portfolio is given by me. You can choose any of them or rather invest in all the funds.

Birla Sunlife Equity Fund
DSPML World Gold Fund
Fidelity Equity Fund
Franklin Templeton Prima Plus
HDFC Prudence Fund
HDFC Top 200 Fund
JM Contra Fund
Kotak K30
Lotus India Agile Fund
Principal Personal Tax Saver
Reliance Growth Fund
SBI MAgnum Comma fund
Sundaram Capex Fund
Tata Infrastructure Fund


Best of luck.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Another Big Dividend from Personal Tax Saver!

Dear all,

Great News!!!

200% dividend declared in Principal Personal Taxsaver.

the dividend record date is Tue, 26 Feb.

The NAV as of 21.2.08 is Rs. 172.13

The Dividend Yield works out to 11.6%

The performance of the scheme is also Superb

1 Year - 45.48%
3 Year - 40.78%
5 Year - 46.52%

(Returns as on 21.2.08. All Returns in CAGR)


If you remember the fund has declared dividend 2 times in last 3 months of 110% each.

Best of luck

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Puravankara Projects - BUY
Though a laggard since listing, Investors with a 3 year view can consider accumulating Puravankara at these levels. The high earnings visibility from its current and planned projects may well provide an upside in the long term. Further, a strong track record of real-estate development, low-cost land bank, more transparent transactions and steady growth in revenue over the last five years are positives.
With a track record of having developed a sizeable area (without having to depend solely on the land bank to discover valuations), I believe there will be a bump in the stock price around the announcement of its annual results.

The company

Puravankara is a real-estate developer with a majority of projects executed in Bangalore. The company’s core business lies in the residential segment with diversification into commercial projects. The company recently raised money in IPO which it plans to deploy the proceeds towards acquisition of land in Tamil Nadu and repayment of debt. While the company is competing with bigger (in terms of turnover) players in this market-cap segment, there appears considerable scope for quickly ramping up revenue.

Comfortable past

Puravankara’s track record of executing 14 residential projects and a commercial one, spanning 3.93 million sq ft of developable area, is proof of its execution capability.


Further, it appears that the company has been benefiting from identifying low-cost land, ahead of the property market. That its land cost, as a proportion of total expenditure, has fallen from 24 per cent in 2004 to 6.4 per cent in 2007, reflects that the company has benefited from the boom in land prices over the last couple of years. Such a sharp decline in land cost also indicates that the company has been able to identify land at the right location and at the right time.

Going by its history and the current land holding, the company appears to prefer locations in cities and their peripheries. We believe that this strategy is relatively less risky as the demand for residential and commercial space is likely to remain robust in such areas. Corrections, if any, are also likely to be less sharp compared to smaller towns. Puravankara, therefore, appears to have a lower risk profile than similar-size peers which are aggressively moving to Tier-II and III cities.

Clean structure

Puravankara’s land holding appears to be structurally superior to a number of real-estate companies. The holding pattern also appears less complex and reflects better clarity in ownership. Of the developable area of 116 million sq ft, 14 million sq ft has ongoing projects in them.

Of the total land, 65 per cent is owned by the company; only 6 per cent of the land is on sole development rights where the title lies with the owner and the company gets only the development rights. The above proportion reduces the risk of any stalling of projects by landowners, who retain the title to the land. Even in the case of joint development projects, the company has stated that its economic interest in the same would be in the 60-77.5 per cent range. This percentage appears to be land owner (who is typically the joint developer) friendly, striking mutual benefit.

The consideration for the above-mentioned land at Rs 795 crore is mostly paid, about 11 per cent remains outstanding.

Given that it has locked into land costs, the company may benefit from appreciation, as the land bank, going by its size, may last six-eight years.

Strength in joint venture

In 2005, Puravankara entered into a joint venture with a subsidiary of the Singapore-based Keppel Land, in which the Singapore Government’s investment arm, Temasek Holdings, has an indirect holding. Keppel Land has a presence across Singapore, China, Indonesia and Vietnam. While this joint venture is likely to improve the company’s execution capability, Puravankara has also been cautious in not exposing more than 7 per cent of its total developable area through this strategy. This venture may give Puravankara a presence in the overseas markets as well. Besides, the company has an ongoing project in Sri Lanka and an office in West Asia. Nevertheless, the venture has its risks, as the agreement does not preclude the venture partners from competing with each other.

The spread

With Bangalore being Puravankara’s strong point, the company continues to have 72 per cent of its developable area in this city. The company has also cautiously taken smaller exposure to land in Kochi and Chennai, Mysore and Hyderabad among other locations.

The demand from the middle- and upper middle-income group, to which Puravankara primarily caters to, is fairly robust in the above locations. Any correction in the now infrastructure constrained Bangalore is unlikely to dent the company’s profitability margins much, as the land is spread across the city and its outer limits. Further, the volume in the above income group segment is likely to provide some insulation to margins.

Strong financials

Puravankara’s revenue has grown at an annual rate of 75 per cent over the past three years, to Rs 417 crore in 2006-07. Operating profit margin at 32 per cent have remained stable over the past four years.

While there was scope for improvement in OPMs, with the land cost having reduced over the years, increasing construction costs appears to have prevented further growth. The margins are nevertheless above industry average.

The company which had a high gear of over 3 regarding debt-equity, is now having a more comfortable ratio of 1 after the IPO.
The soft interest rate scenario will only add to the profits of the company. So, what are you waiting for?

Best of luck.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Reliance Power Bonus Share Issue

The issue of bonus shares is nothing but a gimmick. Bonus is given on fundamentals not on emotion. Free bonus shares ultimately increse the number of share without increasing net worth of the company and hence will decrease the market price of the share further. What kind of compensation is this for investors.it is not a fair practice for company coming with ipo higher price than realising mistakes and to improve image for future issues giving bonus to eye wash investors and capital market.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Why only Mutual fund is targeted by SEBI?

It is becoming a menace to apply for KYC all over again after all the drama over MAPIN., UIN, etc. Isn't Pan Card enough?.
And my question, why is the Mutual Fund industry targeted only?. You dont need a Pan card for Insurance, even for a Ulip!, they why only Mutual Funds. And now, not just Pan card, but also you have to get a KYC done....!. Ha, it clearly shows that Damodaran of SEBI is baised towards Insurance and dead against Mutual Funds. The Insurance Lobby is strong and our Mutual Fund Lobby is eating nuts instead of fighting against this discrimination by SEBI.
See the SEBI has made KYC compulsory for investments above 50000 and also removed the Entry Load for Direct Investments. Now My question is, why not the same treatment for Insurance., Why not have a KYC for Insurance investments and why not remove the premium for Insurance for Direct Investments. I mean why not give the 25% commission the Insurance agent is given to the Ulip investor. Why are after the pittance of 2.25% commission given to the Mutual Fund Investor. Mr.Damodaran., are you listening?


I think no., he is busy listening to the Insurance Lobby on how to make life more miserable to the Mutual Fund Industry.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

ULIP is a Debt Trap

A far as investment in equity markets are concerned, ULIPs should be discarded in the first thought because the equity-unit-linked creates all the confusion and innocent people fall prey.


In the first year, the overhead charges are around 25-30 per cent of the premium paid up in the first year. There is an entry load for the fund, typically around 5 per cent, and management fees or policy administration charges of around 1.5 per cent. Mortality charges, or insurance premiums, are deducted every year, which essentially covers your life. In case of any eventuality, your family gets the insurance amount.

In the first year, the agents get a higher commission paid through the overhead charges, which is the centre point of the debate. The next year, the overhead charges come down between 10 and 7.5 per cent, and from the fourth year onwards, it is 5 per cent. Fund management charges remain static.

As long as there are funds in your account to pay for the premium, your life is covered. If the unit value falls the next year to an extent they don't cover your insurance, you might be told to pay up the insurance premium, or your cover could lapse. Another thing, investments and insurance, they say, should be separated. They offer no guarantee unlike traditional plans which offer 6-10 per cent returns.

Many agents don't dwell on the various charges year on year. Clients are usually told that withdrawals are permitted from the third year onwards and the annual premiums will be taken care by the corpus in the fund. What they don't say is that if there are insufficient funds for payment towards mortality charges, the insurance cover lapses.

A small calculation by any layman will clearly show the loss in ULIPs as compared to mutual funds.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Timing in the Stock Markets

Timing is not important but Time is!. The longer your investment horizon is, the higher your profit should be. Because there is no alternative to equity over a longer period in terms of returns. And what better way than to invest via SIP. The following are my recommendations which my analysis says will give above market returns. These recommendations are a mix of diversified, sector, balanced funds which are recommended with the assumption that you have a long time horizon, i.e., at least 3-5 years.


1. BIRLA SUNLIFE EQUITY FUND
2. DSPML TIGER FUND
3. DSPML WORLD GOLD FUND'
4. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON PRIMA PLUS
5. HDFC TOP 200 FUND
6. LOTUS INDIA AGILE FUND
7. JM CONTRA FUND
8. RELIANCE NATURAL RESOURCES FUND
9. SBI MAGNUM COMMA FUND
10. SBI MAGNUM BALANCED FUND

BEST OF LUCK TO YOU